ISSUE ONE
Court ruled that the petition disclosed a reasonable cause of action
ISSUE TWO
There is evidence on record to show that, the second Respondent obtained more than 50% of the valid votes cast as required by article 63(3) of the 1992 constitution
ISSUE THREE
There is a evidence on record to show that, the second Respondent obtained more than 50% of the valid votes cast as required by article 63(3) of the 1992 constitution if the valid votes cast at the Techiman South constituency are added to the votes as in ISSUE TWO above
ISSUE FOUR
The declaration of the results made by the first Respondent dated the 9th December 2020 of the results of the Presidential election conducted on the 7th December 2020 was not in violation of article 63(3) of the 1992 constitution
ISSUE FIVE
The complain of vote padding by the Petitioner did not affect the outcome of the presidential election conducted on the 7th December 2020
BY COURT
Petition dismissed as unmeritorious
Source: wenomedia.com
